Skip to main content

Limitation of results

lab scientist

Limitations of Genetic tests

In clinical laboratory testing there are potential “uncertainties” that can affect test results (for example; poor specimen collection or transport, patient related factors such as biological variation and the presence of drugs, or other interfering factors).

In addition, the analytical process itself is subject to some degree of inherent variability and this is often referred to as the “reproducibility” or “imprecision” of the method. Laboratories regularly monitor this by the use of internal quality control samples within each batch of analysis and by comparing the results of external quality assurance schemes designed to ensure that results are comparable with others laboratories using similar methods.

Providing relevant clinical details at the time that the request is made can also clarify the significance of a particular result or a change in results.

Measurement uncertainty data for specific tests can be provided to service users upon request.

Where relevant limitations are stated in the footer of the report. Further information is available on request from the lab if required.  Some examples of limitations are listed below.

Cytogenetic results

Cytogenetic results from blood samples will be based on the analysis of a minimum of three banded cells.

The presence of mosaicism for any chromosome abnormality is not routinely investigated by the level of analysis performed unless dictated by the clinical referral reason or suggested by an observation during routine analysis.

The standard count for detection of a clone present at greater than 10% level is 30 cells. This is reported in the karyotype comments if carried out.

The nature of fluorescent in-situ hybridisation (FISH) means that interpretation of FISH signals can be challenging. There is the possibility of split signals (one signal appears as 2), false signals due to background fluorescence and weak signals resulting in them not being detected. For this reason sufficient numbers of metaphases or nuclei are examined to maximise the statistical validity of testing. The number of cells that should be examined depends on the type of FISH being performed.

Prenatal samples

Prenatal reports are based on the analysis of a minimum of three banded cells, and therefore are unlikely to detect mosaicism. It should be noted that the majority of samples sent for prenatal chromosome analysis are taken with a view to screening for uncommon numerical chromosomal abnormalities, particularly Down syndrome.

For technical reasons, the quality of structural analysis on such samples is often conducted at a lower level than that which is required to reliably detect small and unexpected chromosomal deletions and other rearrangements. Although many structural chromosome abnormalities will be detected, those that fall below the limits of resolution of the analysis will be missed.

Oncology samples

For oncology samples a normal cytogenetic result is based on the complete analysis of a minimum of 10 G-banded cells usually with the examination of at least a further 10 cells. The number of cells analysed in abnormal cases or previously abnormal cases may be increased or decreased according to the reason for referral.

A normal in-situ hybridisation result is based on the exclusion of a given abnormality in a minimum of 100 interphase cells. An indication will be given if minimum standards are not reached.

For all cytogenetics analyses the ability to detect subtle, unexpected chromosome rearrangements is governed by the resolution of banding achieved. This is intrinsically highly variable. If the quality of the preparation or extent of the analysis performed is not considered adequate for the reason for referral this will be indicated on the report.

DNA sequencing

Sensitivity of germline DNA Sanger sequencing and NGS sequencing is over 95%.

Rare cases of single nucleotide polymorphisms under the primer binding sites may lead to non-amplification of one allele by Sanger sequencing. The specificity is near 100% where the variant has been previously reported in a first degree relative.

NGS technical sensitivity may be reduced for genes with pseudogenes or paralogs, mosaics and for copy-number variation >20 nucleotides.

Dosage analysis screening for large deletions and duplications is performed using comparative depth of coverage of NGS data (DeCON software: sensitivity >0.999 and specificity 0.989)

Where a sequence variant is novel or has limited evidence, it may be necessary to carry out additional studies and it still may not be possible to reach a conclusion regarding pathogenicity. Only variants of uncertain significance with a high probability of pathogenicity are included in clinical reports.

Low level mutations

In some circumstances it may prove difficult to detect mutations present at a low level, e.g. in cases of mosaicism (particularly if less than 20%) or mitochondrial heteroplasmy or where there is a mixed cell population due to malignancy. Sensitivity of detection may be tissue-specific and in some cases alternative sample types may be required.

You might also be interested in...

Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust
Sheffield Children's@SheffChildrens
We are almost at 1,000 members in our Charity Facebook group! 🥳Could you be our 1,000th member?! Join our Faceboo…
January 2022: Our guidance for inpatients at Sheffield Children's remains that two named parents/carers may be permitted in inpatients. This is under review. Please check the site before you visit.See more about our guidance about inpatients

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.